|
I cried out to the Father, the Most High God, "Just Give Me The Truth!"
by Sherry Shriner sounding the alarm on what was, is, and is to come
|
 To my knowledge, the work I've done to uncover the secret messages hidden within the pages of the Song of Solomon in the Tanach (Old Testament) is original. Neither I nor anyone I've spoken with about this subject has ever heard or read anything such as this before. Father YHWH has led me to this understanding to shed light on the deception that is destroying His Bride and leading her to hell in a cleverly-woven handbasket called Pauline Christianity. It's time for her to discover who she really is, as her identity has been stolen from her, and to wake up to her role in ushering in the Kingdom of YHWH, her husband. The Bride must understand that there has, indeed been a concerted, purposeful and secret agenda working against her for two thousand years or more and that the ones pulling the strings, stealing her blessing and keeping her in bondage, for the most part are the actual, literal genetic decendants of Satan. The Bible says it very clearly in Genesis 3:15 for instance, as well as many other places. The problem is that those members of the Bride who most desparately need to hear this information, for their freedom and eternal salvation, are steeped within Pauline protestantism and the resulting deception has been very damaging to their ability to actually hear YHWH's truth when it is spoken. It is time for the Bride to wake up and be receptive to the Spirit of YHWH that is already being poured out on her for this purpose. One of the key steps necessary for the Bride to come out of her spiritual stupor is to realize, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that her true identity has been stolen from her. She must not only understand this, but recognize as well, the ones who have stolen her identity and have turned things upside down, (Isaiah 29:16) preventing her from accepting her birthright and responsibility in ushering in the kingdom of YHWH, her husband. Just as Yashua states, very clearly, these people are of their father the devil who was a liar and a murderer from the beginning. They lie, because their father is a liar. It is genetic. Those who continue to believe the lie that Salvation comes by simple faith and that it has nothing to do with genetics or obedience to the Law of YHWH, I've got some startling news for you; According to scripture, you are deceived and therefore, wrong and there is no way to sweeten it up . . . unless of course you add in a slice of Pauline pie. I've included chapter two of my book below. I hope you enjoy it. Please feel free to contact me at any time at Author@BlueprintForBondage.com YHWH bless you!
CHAPTER TWO
Solomon's
Secret
Song
It's
always
been
a
very
curious
thing
to
me
how
the
Bride
of
Yashua
so
easily
dismisses
the
possibility
for
hidden
or
underlying
meanings
contained
in
the
scripture,
reserved
for
a
select
few,
(as
if
it
was
an
unspoken
sin
to
entertain
such
an
elitist
thought)
yet
readily
embraces
the
idea
that
Yashua
used
these
very
same
methods
with
every
message
He
gave.
Every
time
we
open
the
scriptures
containing
Yashua's
messages
to
the
people,
we
see,
if
we
are
looking,
that
they
are
full
of
underlying
teachings;
many
of
which
are
more
important
for
our
day
and
age
than
the
overt
message
that
is
readily
noticeable.
These
messages
are
called
parables.
We
have
all
heard
this
term,
but
what
actually
is
a
parable?
A
parable
is
defined
as
a
proverb
(1)
Sam.
10:12; 24:13; 2 Chr. 7:20), (2) a prophetic utterance (Num.23:7, Ezek.20:49), or (3) an enigmatic saying (Ps. 78:2; Prov. 1:6).9
Yashua,
as
we
see
in
Matt.
13:34
never
spoke
to
the
multitudes
or
masses
without
speaking
in
parables;
All
these
things
spake
Jesus
unto
the
multitude
in
parables,
and
without
a
parable
spake
he
not
unto
them.
Then,
in
that
same
chapter
in
verse
36,
we
see
Yashua
sending
the
multitude
away
and
going
into
the
house
(behind
closed
doors,
in
private)
to
explain
to
those
closest
to
Him,
His
disciples,
the
underlying
or
esoteric
meaning
behind
His
enigmatic
story.
Why
did
Yashua
speak
in
parables?
Why
didn't
he
simply
speak
in a
straightforward
manner
without
the
shroud
of
secrecy
covering
his
words?
After
all,
that
is
what
a
parable
does;
doesn't
it .
cover
the
real
meaning?
There
must
have
been
a
reason
for
this
or
He
would
not
have
done
it.
Let's
see
if
we
can
discover
what
this
reason
may
have
been.
In
Matthew
13:10,
Yashua's
disciples
come
to
him
and
ask
Him,
Why
do
you
speak
to
them
in
parables?And
Yashua
then
answers
them
and
says
in
verse
11
Because
it
is
given
unto
you
to
know
the
mysteries
of
the
kingdom
of
heaven,
but
to
them
it
is
not
given.He
then
states
more
specifically
in
verses
13,
14
and
15,
.
I
speak
to
them
in
parables:
because
they
seeing
see
not;
and
hearing
they
hear
not,
neither
do
they
understand.And
in
them
is
fulfilled
the
prophecy
of
Isaiah,
which
says,
By
hearing
ye
shall
hear,
and
shall
not
understand;
and
seeing
ye
shall
see,
and
shall
not
perceive;For
this
people's
heart
is
waxed
gross,
and
their
ears
are
dull
of
hearing,
and
their
eyes
they
have
closed.
So
here
we
have
another
answer
to
the
question
as
to
why
Yashua
spoke
in
parables.
He
spoke
in
parables
so
thatonly
those
who
had
ears
to
hear
would
hear.
This
answer
still
leaves
at
least
two
other
questions
unanswered,
however.
Firstly,
Why
are
only
some
people
able
to
hear,
after
all,
isn't
the
gospel
message
for
everyone?
And
secondly,
Why
did
Yashua
not
just
make
it
plain
for
everyone
to
hear,
instead
of
those
who
were
able
to
discern
the
deeper,
esoteric
and
spiritual
meaning?
The
answers
to
these
two
questions
are
rapidly
forthcoming.
As
we
delve
into
a
message
left
to
us
by
one
of
the
wisest
men
to
ever
live.
We
will
see
that
Yashua
did
not
have
the
market
cornered,
so
to
speak,
on
delivering
esoteric
messages.
Scripture
is
full
of
them.So
it
is
with
the
story
in
the
Garden
in
Eden
(and
many
other
stories
in
scripture)
and
Solomon
knew
this
full
well.
Solomon
in
chapter
4
verses
12-15
and
chapter
5
verses
1-3
of
the
Song
of
Solomon,
paints
for
us
the
following
metaphoric
picture.
(Keeping
in
mind
that
Adam
and
Eve,
according
to
the
creation
story,
had
not
yet
had
sexual
relations,
see
if
you
can
uncover
any
similarities
between
Solomon's
metaphoric
story
and
the
story
of
Eve's
beguilement.)
Solomon
begins
his
description
in
verse
12:A
garden
enclosed
(barred)
is
my
sister,
my
spouse
(betrothed
or
engaged
or
to
be
married),
a
spring
shut
up
(barred),
with
a
fountain
sealed.
13:
Thy
plants
are
an
orchard
(literally
paradise)
of
pomegranates,
with
pleasant
fruits;
camphire,
henna
and
cypress
(as
a
plant
and
tree)
with
spikenard.
14:
Spikenard
and
saffron;
calamus
and
cinnamon
with
all
trees
of
frankincense,
myrrh
and
aloes
and
with
all
the
chief
spices
(literally
spice
plants).
15:
With
a
fountain
of
gardens,
a
well
ofliving
waters,
and
streams
from
Lebanon.
16:
Awake,
Oh
north
wind
and
come
thou
south;
blow
upon
my
garden
that
the
spices
thereof
may
blow
out.
Let
my
beloved
(male)
come
into
his
garden
and
eat
his
pleasant
fruits.
Chapter
5:1
then
reads:
1: I
am
come
into
my
garden,
my
sister
my
spouse
(betrothed)
I am
gathering
my
myrrh
with
my
spice,
I am
eating
my
honeycomb
with
my
honey,
I am
drinking
my
wine
with
my
milk.
Eat
O'
friends
(plural)
drink
ye,
drink
abundantly,
O
beloved.
(Showing
someone
who
is
speaking
to
them
who
is
looking
on
and
encouraging
them
to
continue
in
this
behavior.)
Did
you
notice
the
metaphors?
Did
you
see
the
obvious
references
to
sexuality
as
it
relates
to
the
Garden,
specifically
the
trees,
springs
and
fruits
of
the
Garden?
The
symbolism
here,
as
it
correlates
to
Eden,
is
as
evident
as
the
page
in
front
of
you,
if
you
are
able
to
see
it.
It
breaks
down
as
follows:
The
Sister/Spouse/Betrothed
is
depicted
as a
barred
(forbidden)
garden
and
a
spring
and
a
fountain
(Eden
had
its
own
water
supply
-
Genesis
2:10
and
Eve
was
yet
a
virgin,
therefore
the
reference
is
obvious.)
Her
orchard
in
verse
13,
also
called
a
paradise
(Eden
is
known
as a
paradise
in
the
Septuagint
-
the
Greek
translation
of
the
Old
Testament),
has
pleasant
fruits.
Herspices
in
verse
14
are
literally
called
spice
plants
in
Hebrew
(as
plants
in a
garden,
literally
in
the
Hebrew).
Verse
15
depicts
her
(the
garden)
as
having
a
well
of
living
water
(as
in
the
Garden
in
Eden
and
in a
woman's
yet
untouched
womb).
Verse
15:
awake
Oh
north
wind
(heavenly
or
upwards)
and
come
thou
south
(as
a
created
being
or
man
-
the
significance
of
which
we
will
soon
see)
blow
upon
my
garden,
let
my
beloved
come
into
his
garden
and
eat
his
pleasant
fruits
(of
sexuality).
Chapter
five
then
shows
that
someone
else
is
watching
and
encouraging
this
behavior
when
it
says:
Eat
(fruit)
Oh
friends,
(plural)
drink
abundantly
Oh
beloved
(plural).
This,
of
course
would
be
Satan
(the
shining
one
or
Nachash
(Nawkawsh))
watching
Adam
and
Eve
now
defiling
themselves
with
lust
by
partaking
of
his
handiwork,
and
defiling
YHWH's
perfect
plan
in
the
process.
With
the
help
of
the
Song
of
Solomon,
it
is
becoming
quite
apparent
that
the
sin
in
the
Garden
of
Eden
had
nothing
at
all
to
do
with
the
eating
of
an
apple
or
any
other
literal
fruit.
This
is
not
to
say
that
the
Garden
in
Eden
and
the
things
associated
with
it,
were
not
real,
however,
YHWH,
through
his
impeccable
symbolism
is
telling
us a
story.
To
understand
what
has
happened,
(since
many
reading
this
will
believe
that
YHWH
certainly
did,
because
of
His
words
in
Genesis
chapter
1
verse
28
expect
Adam
and
Eve
to
reproduce)
it
is
imperative
to
first
understand
what
had
taken
place
prior
to
the
creation
of
Adam
and
Eve,
for
they
were
not
alone
on
the
earth.
Prior
to
the
creation
of
Adam
in
chapter
2
verse
7,
we
see
what
seems
to
be
the
entire
creation
story
rendered
in
chapter
1.
Most
members
of
the
Bride
of
Yashua
have
falsely
been
taught
that
Adam
was
created
in
verse
27
of
chapter
1.
However,
this
does
not
seem
to
be
the
case.
And,
it
cannot
be
for
a
couple
very
important
reasons
that
we
can
begin
to
see
when
we
review
these
accounts
in
the
original
language.
First,
it
says
in
chapter
1
verse
27
that
God
created
male
and
female
at
the
same
time.
In
verse
27
we
read:
So
God
created
man
in
His
own
image,
in
the
image
of
God
created
He
him;
male
and
female
created
He
them.
At
first
glance,
there
seems
to
be
no
problem
with
this
statement
in
Genesis,
for
it
sounds
simple
enough.
God
created
them,
right?
Well,
if
this
is
the
same
creation
account
that
we
read
in
chapter
2 of
Genesis,
there
are
two
problems
with
this
version,
that
is,
if
it
is
the
same
creation.
First
of
all,
the
name(s)
of
the
creators
are
entirely
different.
That's
right.
Although
translated
God
in
our
adulterated
English
versions,
there
are
two
entirely
different
names
of
the
creators
in
chapters
1
and
2.
In
the
first
account,
the
name
for
the
creator
is
the
Hebrew
word
Elohiym
meaning
literally
gods,
rulers
or
divine
ones.10In
the
second
chapter
of
Genesis,
where
Adam
and
Eve
were
created
separately,
as
individuals,
the
word
used
for
the
creator
is
Jehovah
(YHWH)
which
means
The
One
Supreme
God.11
Why
the
difference?
After
all,
we're
taught
there
is
one
and
onlyone
God,
right?
Well,
after
closer
observation,
it
becomes
obvious,
that
many
of
the
Bride's
preconceived
ideas,
due
to
what
she
has
been
taught,
(especially
of
creation),
are
completely
false.
And
this
apparent
predicament
of
creation
cannot
be
explained
away
by
designating
Yashua
and
the
Holy
Spirit
as
co-creators
with
YHWH,
as
parts
of
the
trinity.
Yashua
and
the
Holy
Spirit
are
considered
parts
of
the
trinity
with
YHWH
only,
and
therefore
could
not
have
been
partakers
in
the
creation
of
mankind
in
chapter
1 of
Genesis.
YHWH
(Jehovah)
was
the
creator
in
chapter
2.
This
issue
is
one
of
the
cornerstones
upon
which
the
confusion
of
the
Bride's
identity
has
been
built,
and
cannot
be
relegated
to
the
unseen
dust
of
untouchable
heresies
under
the
rigid
rug
of
doctrine
simply
because
it
may
be
offensive
to
someone's
beliefs.
It
must
be
discussed
for
the
liberation
of
the
Bride!
She
has
suffered
long
enough
as
to
her
identity.
It
is
time
for
her
to
take
back
the
name
of
her
husband
and
the
birthright
that
is
rightfully
hers.
She
was
created
after
mankind,
(just
as
Eve
was
created
after
the
man,
Adam),
and
was
set
apart
for
a
specific
purpose
as
the
precious
Bride
of
YHWH,
and
no
other
god.
Now,
of
all
the
creatures
that
YHWH
had
made,
Adam
and
Eve
had
not
yet
been
told
to
reproduce
and
be
fruitful
and
multiply.
Therefore,
YHWH
said
to
Adam
whom
he
put
in
charge,
do
not
eat
of
it,
for
in
the
day
you
do,
you
shall
surely
die.
YHWH
is
speaking
here
of
the
fruit
of
sexuality.
Eve's
garden
was
not
to
be
touched
yet
by
Adam
in
any
way,
or
vice
versa.
There
was
no
reason
for
them
to
reproduce
at
this
point.
For
further
support
for
this
idea
we
can
read
in
chapters
2:7,
3:5,
8:4
and
several
other
places
in
the
Song
of
Solomon
the
same
words
over
and
over,
as
if
the
writer
was
trying
to
make
a
point
through
repetition;
I
charge
you,
O ye
daughters
of
Jerusalem
. .
.
that
ye
stir
not
up
nor
awake
my
love
till
he
please.
In
other
words,
it
would
appear
that
YHWH,
for
whatever
reason,
had
not
yet
wanted
Adam
and
Eve
to
reproduce,
and
Satan
knew
this.
Satan,
having
already
corrupted
man's
mind
and
emotions
has
now
engaged
in
the
literal
adulteration
of
the
body
and
hence
the
most
precious
relationship
of
all,
marriage.
This
story
literally
depicts
the
first
case
of
infidelity.
Satan's
goal
was
to
genetically
corrupt
or
splinter
the
perfect
seed
(bloodline)
of
God's
creation;
and
that
is
exactly
what
he
did.
Disguised
as
the
Nachash
or
serpent
(Revelation
12:9)
(which
has
been
a
long-time
phallic
symbol)
Lucifer
seduced
Eve
by
bringing
attention
to
and
offering
her
the
forbidden
fruit
of
sexuality.
Once
she
saw
it
and
lusted
after
it,
she
ate
of
it
by
having
intercourse
withtheSerpent,
or
Nachash.
Having
been
enticed
by
Satan
with
the
forbidden
fruit
of
sexuality,
Eve
had
sexual
intercourse
with
Satan,
just
like
the
Sons
of
YHWH
(fallen
angels)
mated
with
the
daughters
of
man
later,
in
Genesis
6:4.
Eve
then
gave
it
to (also
had
sex
with)
Adam,
as
Lucifer
watched
on
and
encouraged
it,
as
was
pointed
out
earlier
from
the
Song
of
Solomon,
chapter
5
verse
1;
Eat
O
friends,
drink
abundantly
O
beloved.
Although
most
pastors
in
an
attempt
to
argue
against
what
has
happened
here,
(one
must
ask
why
such
an
adamant
defense?)
will
use
Genesis
4:1
which
states:And
Adam
knew
Eve
his
wife;
and
she
conceived,
and
bare
Cain,
and
said,
I
have
gotten
a
man
from
the
LORD.
As
much
as
the
tares
(Satan's
seed,
children)
have
tried
to
conceal
their
genetic
origins
and
their
father's
identity,
by
covering
up
the
original
rendering
of
this
passage,
(and
many
others),
YHWH
in
his
foresight
and
wisdom
has
revealed
Himself
and
confirmed
His
truth
elsewhere,
as
He
always
does
for
those
willing
to
seek.
We
can
read
of
this
same
story
in
the
Aramaic
Targum,
pseudo-Jonathan,
which
shows
us
that
Genesis
4:1
has
obviously
been
tampered
with
at
some
point
by
these
evil
infiltrators.
(Jude
v.
4)
It
should
actually
be
read
as
follows;
And
Adam
knew
his
wife
Eve,
who
was
pregnant
by
Sammael
(Satan),
and
she
conceived
and
bare
Cain,
and
he
was
like
the
heavenly
beings,
and
not
like
the
earthly
beings,
and
she
said,
I
have
gotten
a
man
from
the
angel
of
the
Lord.12
Lest
there
be
any
doubt
in
the
readers
mind
as
to
the
identity
of
Sammael
in
this
passage,
we
read
in
The
International
Standard
Bible
Encyclopedia,
according
to
Jewish
theology.
the
destroyer
or
angel
of
death
appears
under
the
name
Sammael
(i.e.
the
poison
of
God),
who
was
once
an
arch-angel
before
the
throne
of
God,
and
who
caused
the
serpent
to
tempt
Eve.
According
to
Weber,
he
is
not
to
be
distinguished
from
Satan.13
These
and
other
aberrations
of
our
nearly
worshipped
King
James
translation
of
the
Bible
are
not
surprising
however,
as
there
has
been
a
concerted
effort
to
thwart
the
purposes
of
YHWH
throughout
scripture.
This
situation
is
no
different.
The
Holy
Scriptures
of
YHWH
seem
to
be
vulnerable
to
these
evil
men's
tactics,
just
as
are
his
people.
We
can
read
where
YHWH
warns
us
of
such
an
infiltration,
when
we
read
in
Jude
verse
4
For
there
are
certain
men
crept
in
unawares
(secretly),
who
were
before
of
old
ordained
to
this
condemnation,
ungodly
men,
turning
the
grace
of
our
God
into
lasciviousness
(literally
unbridled
lust,
as
in
the
garden),
and
denying
the
only
Lord
God,
and
our
Lord
Jesus
Christ.
For
further
support
of
this
idea
of
Biblical
tampering,
we
read
Sir
Thomas
Moore's
words
in
reference
to
Tyndale,
in
theJournal
of
English
and
Germanic
Philology,
(Tyndale)
was
guilty
of
intentionally
mistranslating
the
Bible.14And
Tyndale's
translations
were
one
thing
that
eventually
led
to
his
death
at
the
stake!15
Michael
Baigent
and
Richard
Leigh,
in
their
book
entitled
The
Dead
Sea
Scrolls
Deception
also
support
this
idea
of
deception
and
tampering
by
saying,
There
is
virtually
unanimous
agreement
among
all
the
concerned
parties
.
that
the
history
of
Dead
Sea
Scroll
scholarship
does
constitute
a
scandal.
And
there
would
seem
to
be
little
doubt
that
something
irregular.
lurks
behind
the
delays,
the
procrastinations,
the
equivocation,
the
restrictions
on
material.16
(The
sited
references
are
not
isolated
opinions
by
any
means.
If
one
were
to
study
this
subject
for
even
a
short
period
of
time,
it
would
become
quickly
apparent
that
they
were
in
good
company
with
many
well-known
and
respected
theologians
and
religious
researchers
over
the
years
who
have
viewed
the
intentional
adulteration
of
the
scriptures
as
common
knowledge.
It
is
time
that
the
Bride
wakes
up
to
this
fact
and
protects
herself
from
its
intended
effects.
This
is
one
of
the
main
reasons
for
this
book.)
After
their
sin,
Adam
and
Eve
knew
they
were
naked
and
were
cast
out
of
the
garden
(paradise
or
presence
of
God.)
Eve
is
told
that
YHWH
will
multiply
her
sorrow
in
childbirth
and
her
desire
would
be
for
her
husband
who
would
rule
over
her.
Therefore
her
entire
curse
was
based
on
sex
and
her
womb/seed.
Adam
was
told
that
because
he
listened
to
her
and
ate
of
the
tree
(had
sex)
that
the
ground
(also
symbolic
of a
woman's
womb)
would
be
cursed
and
he
would
eat
of
it
(have
sex
/
reap
what
he
has
sown,
via
his
own
seed
and
actions)
in
sorrow
(arguing,
fighting,
striving
and
having
to
contend
with
the
seed
that
had
been
sown
in
Eve's
womb)
all
the
days
of
his
life.
He
was
also
told
it
would
bring
forth
thistles
/
thorns
(tares)
and
that
he
was
to
eat
of
the
herb
of
the
field
(as
mankind
in
Genesis
1:29).
We
see
here,
that
both
Adam's
and
Eve's
curses
were
sexual
in
nature.
The
question
must
therefore
be
asked,
why
would
their
curses
be
sexual
in
nature
unless
their
sin
was
sexual
in
nature
as
well?
YHWH's
punishment
always
fits
the
sin.
To
add
even
more
support
to
this
idea,
the
first
time
that
the
word
knew
is
used
it
is
in
reference
to
their
eyes
being
opened
after
eating
the
fruit
(having
sexual
relations)
in
Genesis
3:7.
The
very
next
time
it
is
used
is
in
direct
reference
to
sexual
intercourse.
Genesis
4:1
says;
And
Adam
knew
Eve,
his
wife
and
she
conceived
and
bare
Cain.
She
goes
on
to
bare
Abel
in
verse
2.
What
is
interesting
here,
however
is
that
the
word
knew
is
used
only
one
time
and
there
are
two
children
born.
(The
explanation
for
which
we
have
seen
previously
from
the
Aramaic
Targum
-
Pseudo
Jonathan.)
Later
in
verse
25
of
the
same
chapter,
the
word
knew
is
used
once
and
there
is
only
one
reference
to a
child,
Seth.
We
can
deduce,
therefore,
that
Eve
was
known
once
by
the
Nachash
or
Serpent
and
once
by
Adam,
her
husband.
Further
supporting
this
idea
is
the
fact
that
beginning
in
Genesis
5:1,
Cain
is
not
mentioned
in
the
lineage
of
Adam.
He
was
apparently
not
Adam's
seed,
but
of
another,
as
we
read
in I
John
3:12:
Not
as
Cain,
who
was
of
that
wicked
one
and
slew
his
brother.
Also
in
John
8:44
we
read:
Ye
are
of
your
father
the
devil
and
the
lusts
of
your
father
ye
will
do.
He
was
a
murderer
from
the
beginning
and
abode
not
in
the
truth,
because
there
is
no
truth
in
him.
When
he
speaketh
a
lie,
he
speaketh
of
his
own,
for
he
is a
liar
and
the
FATHER
of
it.
What
was
the
first
lie
ever
spoken?
Ye
shall
not
surely
die.
Who
spoke
it?
Satan,
the
serpent
did
when
he
spoke
to
Eve
and
became
the
father
of
lies.
Who
was
the
first
person
murdered
in
the
Bible?
Abel.
Who
killed
him?
Cain,
his
brother,
who
was
of
that
wicked
one.
(I
John
3:12.)
If
there
still
remain
any
doubts
in
your
mind
because
of
the
clouds
of
mainstream
religious
indoctrination,
as
to
who
the
father
of
Cain
was,
or
as
to
the
tree
being
used
as a
metaphor
of
sexuality,
we
simply
need
to
look
elsewhere
in
scripture
to
verify
these
facts,
as
with
any
other
truth
of
YHWH's
word.
There
are
many
places
which
tell
of
these
same
truths.
In I
John
3:12
we
read,
Not
as
Cain,
who
was
of
that
wicked
one,
and
slew
his
brother.
Let's
look
at
some
other
translations
to
see
how
they
express
the
words
of
this
verse:
The
New
Testament
in
Modern
English:
We
are
none
of
us
to
have
the
spirit
of
Cain,
who
was
a
son
of
the
devil.
Living
Bible:
We
are
not
to
be
like
Cain,
who
belonged
to
Satan.
New
English
Bible:
.unlike
Cain
who
was
a
child
of
the
evil
one..
New
Century
Bible:
Do
not
be
like
Cain
who
belonged
to
the
Evil
One.
New
Jerusalem
Bible:
.not
to
be
like
Cain,
who
was
from
the
Evil
One.
There
are
even
many
Bible
commentaries,
which
say
the
same
thing:
The
Wycliffe
Bible
Commentary
page
1473:
He
(Cain)
is
said
to
have
belonged
to
the
family
of
the
wicked
one.
Matthew
Poole's
Commentary
on
the
Holy
Bible,
volume
3,
page
936.
Which
showed
him
(Cain)
to
be
of
that
wicked
one,
of
the
serpent's
seed:
so
early
was
such
seed
sown,
and
so
ancient
the
enmity
between
seed
and
seed.
Matthew
Henry's
Commentary,
volume
6
page
1077:
It
showed
that
he
(Cain)
was
as
the
firstborn
of
the
serpent's
seed.
And, once again, In John 8:44 we hear Jesus speaking to the Pharisees and proclaiming, Ye are of your father the devil.
The
term
of
meaning
literally,
generation
or
offspring17,
once
again
adds
verification
to
the
fact
that
Cain,
just
like
the
Pharisees,
was
the
physical,
literal
seed
of
his
father
the
devil.
In
regards
to
the
tree
being
used
as a
metaphor
for
sexuality,
we
must
realize
that
this
is a
common
literary
tool
used
throughout
the
entire
Bible.
Here
are
some
examples.
Proverbs
3:18
states,
And
she
is
a
tree
of
life
to
them
that
lay
hold
upon
her,
and
happy
is
everyone
that
retaineth
her.
Proverbs
11:30
says,
The
fruit
of
the
righteous
is a
tree
of
life.
It
would
seem
that
Matthew
was
familiar
with
the
tree
references
as
well,
for
his
book
is
full
of
this
metaphor:
Mat
3:10
And
now
also
the
axe
is
laid
unto
the
root
of
the
trees:
therefore
every
tree
which
bringeth
not
forth
good
fruit
is
hewn
down,
and
cast
into
the
fire.
Mat
7:17
Even
so
every
good
tree
bringeth
forth
good
fruit;
but
a
corrupt
tree
bringeth
forth
evil
fruit.
Mat
7:18
A
good
tree
cannot
bring
forth
evil
fruit,neither
can
a
corrupt
tree
bring
forth
good
fruit.
Mat
7:19
Every
tree
that
bringeth
not
forth
good
fruit
is
hewn
down,
and
cast
into
the
fire.
Mat
12:33
Either
make
the
tree
good,
and
his
fruitgood;
or
else
make
the
tree
corrupt,
and
his
fruit
corrupt:
for
the
tree
is
known
by
his
fruit.
It should be obvious at this point of the symbolism used in Genesis, as its significance to what has happened.
In
his
attempt
to
adulterate
the
bloodline
of
YHWH,
Lucifer
impregnated
Eve
before
Adam
even
had
a
chance
to
consummate
his
relationship
with
his
beautiful
virgin
wife,
who
had
given
herself
over
(in
every
sense
of
the
word)
to
another
(shining,
as
in
copper
18
or
gold
or
silver)
god.
I
will
cover
the
great
significance
and
symbolism
of
this
situation
more,
later.
Maintaining
the
secret
knowledge
of
this
adultery
in
Eden
is
one
of
the
key
components
that
has
allowed
the
current
power
structure
to
maintain
its
satanic
stranglehold
on
the
Bride.
For,
by
keeping
this
genealogical
secret,
those
who
rule
by
evil,
ungodly
means
have
not
only
maintained
their
false
identity
(crucial
for
that
purpose)
and
blinded
the
Bride
to
her
own
identity,
but
they
have
also
taken
on
the
identity
of
the
Bride
in
the
process,
giving
her
another
identity,
altogether.
I
had
stated
earlier
that
I
would
get
back
to
Yashua's
statements
about
judging
one's
brother
who
has
a
particle
of
dust
in
his
eye,
when
you've
got
a
beam
in
your
own.
Incidentally,
the
word
beam
is
the
word
dokes
in
the
Greek,which
means
a
piece
of
timber
and
literally
means
actively
holding
up19(therefore
onto)
this
timber.
This
begs
the
question,
can
a
tree
not
stand
on
its
own
if
it
is
indeed
a
tree?
We
can
therefore
read
this
passage
(in
relation
to
someone
who
interprets
the
tree
of
the
knowledge
of
good
and
evil
literally,
and
reacts
harshly
against
(judges)
another
who
understands
the
symbolism
behind
this
story)
as
follows:
Why
do
you
judge
so
harshly
your
brother
who
understands
the
truth,
that
Satan
splintered
and
adulterated
YHWH's
perfect
creation
for
his
own
purposes,
when
you,
yourself
refuse
to
let
go
of
(or
stop
holding
up
or
onto)
the
false
teaching
that
this
tree
(timber)
was
literal?
Let
go
of
the
false
teachings
that
blind
you
spiritually
(ie.
get
rid
of
the
religious
trees
or
doctrines
in
your
eye)
so
that
you
can
see
clearly,
spiritually
and
therefore
help
your
brother
who
has
specs
of
sin
in
his
own
life.
Yashua
makes
it
clear
that
continuing
in
blinding
religious
doctrines
or
teachings
is
an
extremely
dangerous
sin,
due
to
the
deceit
it
fosters,
and
must
be
proactively
and
intentionally
done
away
with
by
the
individual
themselves
before
they
are
able
to
understand
anything
of
depth,
spiritually.
After
all
this,
it
is
still
necessary
to
clarify
one
thing;
was
Satan's
attempt
to
corrupt
the
bloodline
of
Yashua
also
successful,
like
his
attempt
to
corrupt
the
mind
and
emotions?
Yes,
and
no.
He
was
able
to
propagate
his
own
literal
progeny
or
seed,
here
on
earth
through
Cain,
however,
he
was
not
able
to
adulterate
the
actual
bloodline
of
Yashua.
Satan's
actual
children
are
literally
living,
to
this
day
among
YHWH's
true
Israelite
People
all
around
the
world;
masquerading
as
members
of
the
Bride
of
Yashua.
How
do
we
know
this
to
be
the
case?
In
Matthew
chapter
13:24-30,
Jesus
speaks
a
parable
to
his
disciples.
This
is
what
he
says:
Another
parable
he
put
forth
unto
them
saying,
the
kingdom
of
heaven
is
likened
unto
a
man
who
sowed
good
seed
in
his
field,
but
while
men
slept
(remember
in
the
Song
of
Solomon,
chapter
4:16
where
it
says
awake
Oh
north
wind?)
his
enemy
came
and
sowed
tares
among
the
wheat,
and
went
his
way.
But
when
the
blade
was
sprung
up
and
brought
forth
fruit,
then
appeared
the
tares
also.
So,
the
servants
of
the
householder
said
to
Him,
sir,
didst
not
thou
sow
good
seed
in
thy
field?
From
whence
then
hath
it
tares?
He
said
unto
them;
an
enemy
hath
done
this!
The
servants
said
unto
him;
wilt
thou
then
that
we
go
and
gather
them
up?
But
he
said;
nay,
lest
while
ye
gather
up
the
tares,
ye
root
up
the
wheat
also
with
them.
Let
both
grow
together
until
the
harvest:
and
in
the
time
of
harvest
I
will
say
to
the
reapers;
gather
ye
together
first
the
tares,
and
bind
them
into
bundles
and
burn
them,
but
gather
the
wheat
into
my
barn.
Yashua's
disciples,
in
verses
36 -
43
of
the
same
chapter,
ask
Him
to
expound
on
His
parable.
After
He
sent
the
multitudes
away,
He
took
the
disciples
into
the
house
behind
closed
doors
to
explain
the
parable
and
fulfill
what
it
says
in
Matthew
13:35;
that
it
might
be
revealed
which
was
spoken
by
the
prophet,
saying:
I
will
open
my
mouth
in
parables,
I
will
utter
things
which
have
been
kept
secret
from
the
foundation
of
the
world.
Christ
goes
on
to
explain
to
his
disciples
in
Matthew
13:37:
He
that
soweth
the
good
seed
is
the
Son
of
Man
(Christ),
the
field
is
the
world,
the
good
seed
are
the
children
of
the
kingdom,
but
the
tares
are
the
children
of
the
wicked
one.
The
enemy
that
sowed
them
is
the
Devil
(serpent),
the
harvest
is
the
end
of
the
world
and
the
reapers
are
the
angels.
As
therefore
the
tares
are
gathered
and
burned
in
the
fire,
so
shall
it
be
in
the
end
of
the
world
(age).For
him
who
has
(spiritual)
ears
to
hear,
let
him
hear.
Having
the
knowledge
that
Satan
has
literally
sired
his
progeny
here
on
the
earth,
through
Cain,
and
knowing
what
havoc
they
have
wreaked
on
the
Bride
(which
we
will
also
look
at
later),
we
must
ask
ourselves
the
obvious
question;
why
did
YHWH
not
kill
Cain
instead
of
letting
him
live?
Was
YHWH
not
justified
in
taking
Cain's
life,
according
to
His
own Law, just
as
Cain
took
Abel's?
Of
course
He
was.
And,
under
other
circumstances,
YHWH
would
have
done
this,
just
as
He's
done
many
times
throughout
scripture.
There
was
a
problem,
however
in
this
particular
situation,
and
Satan
knew
this.
Under
YHWH's
law,
as
stated
in
Exodus
13:13,
Exodus
34:20
and
Numbers
18:15,
a
firstborn
human
male
must
be
redeemed.
Cain,
being
the
firstborn
son,
therefore,
had
to
be
redeemed
and
Satan
knew
this.
YHWH,
choosing
to
do
the
next
best
thing,
then
chose
to
put
an
identifying
mark
on
Cain
(Genesis
4:15b;
And
the
LORD
set
a
mark
upon
Cain,
lest
any
finding
him
should
kill
him.)
Satan
knows
YHWH's
law,
and
it
is
imperative
for
the
Bride
of
Yashua
to
understand
this.
He
even
quoted
it
to
Yashua
in
Matthew
4:6
where
we
read,
And
saith
unto
him,
If
thou
be
the
Son
of
God,
cast
thyself
down:
for
it
is
written,
He
shall
give
his
angels
charge
concerning
thee:
and
in
[their]
hands
they
shall
bear
thee
up,
lest
at
any
time
thou
dash
thy
foot
against
a
stone.(Psalm
91:11
and
12.)
Attempting
to
use
YHWH's
law
against
Him
has
been
a
tool
implemented
by
Satan
many
times
throughout
scripture,
because,
as
we
will
soon
see,
the
law
of
YHWH
(and
the
Bride's
obedience
to
it)
is
paramount
in
the
ushering
in
of
YHWH's
kingdom,
through
his
remnant
here
on
earth;
an
issue
we
will
soon
explore.
|
